More than a tool: Artificial Intelligence in a philosophical history of technologies

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: 2025-12-31
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59203/zfn.79.730
Keywords:
Array, Array, Array, Array

Main Article Content

Miroslav Vacura
Prague University of Economics and Business, Czech Republic

Abstract

This article examines artificial intelligence and shows how it is embedded in a history of technology. It develops a philosophical classification of tools as technologies based on the degree and nature of mediation that technology provides between humans and the world. Drawing on phenomenological and post-phenomenological conceptions—in particular the work of Ihde, Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty—it identifies five distinct stages in the historical development of technology, ranging from simple passive extensions of the body to advanced artificial intelligence systems. Each stage is defined by a qualitatively different mode of technological mediation between humans and the world, each transforming human perception and intentionality in increasingly complex ways. The most recent contemporary fifth stage in the evolution of technology, is characterized by the use of artificial neural networks, and the article demonstrates that a significant break from lower artificial intelligence systems separates this technology. Unlike simpler machines, these systems exhibit partial autonomy, are not epistemically transparent, and their outputs are unpredictable, forcing us to rethink their instrumental nature and the nature of instrumentality itself.

Article Details

Issue

No. 79 (2025)

Section

SPECIAL ISSUE: Philosophy in Technology
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Vacura, M. (2025) “More than a tool: Artificial Intelligence in a philosophical history of technologies”, Philosophical Problems in Science (Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce) [Preprint], (79). doi:10.59203/zfn.79.730.

References

Aristotle. 1926. Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by H. Rackham. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Arkoudas, Konstantine. 2023. ChatGPT is no Stochastic Parrot. But it also Claims that 1 is Greater than 1. Philosophy & Technology 36 (3): 54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00619-6.

Ashton, Thomas S. 1997. The Industrial Revolution 1760-1830. Oxford: Oxford University PressNew York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192892898.001.0001.

Baars, Bernard. 1995. A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bender, Emily M., Timnit Gebru, Angelina McMillan-Major, and Shmargaret Shmitchell. 2021. On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness,

Accountability, and Transparency, 610–623. Virtual Event Canada: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922.

Biever, Celeste. 2023. ChatGPT broke the Turing test — the race is on for new ways to assess AI. Nature 619 (7971): 686–689. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-02361-7.

Block, Ned. 2009. Comparing the Major Theories of Consciousness. In The Cognitive Neurosciences, 4th ed., edited by Michael S. Gazzaniga. Cambridge: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8029.003.0099.

Bostrom, Nick. 2014. Superintelligence: paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bower, John R. F. 1977. Attributes of Oldowan and Lower Acheulean Tools: “Tradition” and Design in the Early Lower Paleolithic. The South African Archaeological Bulletin 32:113–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/3888658.

Brown, Tom B., Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, et al. 2020. Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. Version Number: 4. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2005.14165.

Chalmers, David. 1995. Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2 (3): 200–219.

Chalmers, David. 2010. The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis. Journal of Consciousness Studies 17 (9-10): 7–65.

Comte, Auguste. 1830. Cours de Philosophie Positive. Paris: Bachelier.

Dehaene, Stanislas. 2014. Consciousness and the brain: deciphering how the brain codes our thoughts. New York: Penguin Books.

Floridi, Luciano. 2023. AI as Agency Without Intelligence: on ChatGPT, Large Language Models, and Other Generative Models. Philosophy & Technology 36 (1): 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00621-y.

Gibson, James J. 2015. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition. Hove: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740218.

Gilpin, Leilani H., David Bau, Ben Z. Yuan, Ayesha Bajwa, Michael Specter, and Lalana Kagal. 2018. Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learning. In 2018 IEEE 5th International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA), 80–89. Turin, Italy: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/DSAA.2018.00018.

Goertzel, Ben. 2023. Generative AI vs. AGI: The Cognitive Strengths and Weaknesses of Modern LLMs. Version Number: 1. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2309.10371.

Grünbaum, Abraham Anton. 1930. Aphasie und Motorik. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie 130 (1): 385–412.

Heidegger, Martin. 2010. Being and time. Translated by J. Stambaugh. Albany: State University of New York Press, SUNY Press.

Hoff, Kevin Anthony, and Masooda Bashir. 2015. Trust in Automation: Integrating Empirical Evidence on Factors That Influence Trust. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 57 (3): 407–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814547570.

Homer. 2007. The Iliad. 2nd ed. Translated by I.C. Johnston. Arlington: Richer Resources Publications.

Hongladarom, Soraj, and Auriane Van Der Vaeren. 2024. ChatGPT, Postphenomenology, and the Human-Technology-Nature Relations. Journal of Human-Technology Relations 2. https://doi.org/10.59490/jhtr.2024.2.7386.

Ihde, Don. 1979. Technics and praxis. Boston studies in the philosophy of science. Dordrecht; Holland; Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

James, Ian. 2019. Tekhne. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acref ore/9780190201098.013.121.

Ji, Ziwei, Nayeon Lee, Rita Frieske, Tiezheng Yu, Dan Su, Yan Xu, Etsuko Ishii, Ye Jin Bang, Andrea Madotto, and Pascale Fung. 2023. Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation. ACM Computing Surveys 55(12): 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3571730.

Jones, Cameron R., and Benjamin K. Bergen. 2025. Large Language Models Pass the Turing Test. Version Number: 1. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2503.23674.

Kapp, Ernst. 2015. Grundlinien einer Philosophie der Technik: zur Entstehungsgeschichte der Kultur aus neuen Gesichtspunkten. Hamburg: F. Meiner.

Köhler,Wolfgang. 1976. The mentality of apes. New York: Liveright.

Koloski-Ostrow, Ann Olga. 2008. New Perspectives on Ancient Technology and Engineering in Greece and Rome. Technology and Culture 49 (4): 1025–1030.

Lee, John D., and K. A. See. 2004. Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance. Human Factors: The

Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46 (1): 50–80. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392.

Leonelli, Sabina. 2016. Data-Centric Biology: A Philosophical Study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Malherbe, Mathieu, Liran Samuni, Sonja J. Ebel, Kathrin S. Kopp, Catherine Crockford, and Roman M.Wittig. 2024. Protracted development of stick tool use skills extends into adulthood in wild western chimpanzees. Edited by Frans B. M. DeWaal. PLOS Biology 22 (5): e3002609. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002609.

Marcus, Gary, and Ernest Davis. 2020. GPT-3, Bloviator: OpenAI’s language generator has no idea what it’s talking about. Technology Review 294. https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/08/22/1007539/gpt3- openailanguage-generator-artif icial-intelligence-ai-opinion accessed January 9, 2026.

Marx, Karl. 1990. Capital: a critique of political economy, Volume 1. Edited by B. Fowkes. London; New York: Penguin Books in association with New Left Review.

McLuhan, Marshall. 2002. Understanding media: the extensions of man. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2005. Phenomenology of perception. Edited by C. Smith. London; New York: Routledge.

Mumford, Lewis. 1934. Technics and Civilization. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul PLC.

Nagel, Thomas. 1974. What Is It Like to Be a Bat? The Philosophical Review 83 (4): 435–450. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183914.

Vo-Nhu, Thai. 2025. The Thief of Virtue: “AI slop” is more than just bad content. https://blog.apaonline.org/2025/12/24/the-thief -of -virtue-ai-slop-is-more-than-just-bad-content accessed January 10, 2026.

Nolan, Patrick, and Gerhard Lenski. 2009. Human societies: an introduction to macrosociology. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

O’Neil, Cathy. 2016. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York: Crown Publishing Group.

Ong,Walter J. 2012. Orality and literacy: the technologizing of the word. 30th anniversary ed. London: Routledge.

Pacovská, Kamila. 2024. Being at Home in theWorld. In Platonism, edited by Herbert Hrachovec and Jakub Mácha, 247–268. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111386294-016.

Pasquale, Frank. 2016. The black box society: the secret algorithms that control money and information. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Rosenberger, Robert. 2017. Callous Objects: Designs Against the Homeless. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Rosenthal, David. 2010. Consciousness and Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Rudin, Cynthia. 2019. Stop Explaining Black Box Machine Learning Models for High Stakes Decisions and Use Interpretable Models Instead. Publisher: arXiv Version Number: 3. https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.10154 accessed March 14, 2026.

Russell, Stuart J., and Peter Norvig. 2016. Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Pearson Education.

Siegler, Robert S. 1976. Three aspects of cognitive development. Cognitive Psychology 8 (4): 481–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(76)90016-5.

Sparkes, Andrew,Wayne Aubrey, Emma Byrne, Amanda Clare, Muhammed N Khan, Maria Liakata, Magdalena Markham, et al. 2010. Towards Robot Scientists for autonomous scientific discovery. Automated Experimentation 2 (1): 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1759-4499-2-1.

Špecián, Petr, and Jitka Špeciánová. 2025. Universal Basic AI Access: Countering the Digital Divide. Acta Informatica Pragensia 14 (2): 272–281. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.aip.270.

Sullins, John P. 2011. When Is a Robot a Moral Agent? In Machine ethics, edited by M. Anderson and S.L. Anderson, 151–161. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Toffler, Alvin. 1990. The third wave. New York: Bantam Books.

Tononi, Giulio. 2008. Consciousness as Integrated Information: a Provisional Manifesto. The Biological Bulletin 215(3): 216–242. https://doi.org/10.2307/25470707.

Turing, Alan M. 1950. Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind 59 (236): 433–460.

Verbeek, Peter-Paul. 2005. What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. Pennsylvania State University Press.

Verbeek, Peter-Paul. 2011. Moralizing technology: understanding and designing the morality of things. Chicago: The University of Chicago press.

Vervoort, Louis, Vitaliy Mizyakov, and Anastasia Ugleva. 2023. A criterion for Artificial General Intelligence: hypotheticdeductive reasoning, tested on ChatGPT. Version Number: 1. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2308.02950.

Weidinger, Laura, John Mellor, Maribeth Rauh, Conor Griffin, Jonathan Uesato, Po-Sen Huang, Myra Cheng, et al. 2021. Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Models. Version Number: 1. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2112.04359.

Wilson, Andrew. 2002. Machines, Power and the Ancient Economy. Journal of Roman Studies 92:1–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/3184857.

Zerilli, John, Alistair Knott, James Maclaurin, and Colin Gavaghan. 2019. Transparency in Algorithmic and Human Decision-Making: Is There a Double Standard? Philosophy & Technology 32 (4): 661–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0330-6.