On the philosophy and logic of human action: A Neo-Austrian contribution to the methodology of the social sciences
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Philosophical action theory seems to be in pretty good shape. The same may not be true for the study of human action in economics. Famous is the rant that the study of human action in economics gives reason to tremble for the reputation of the subject. But how does this come about? Since economic action is about action, the broader study must surely have a strong impact on the more specific field. The paper sets out, from the ground up, how an essential concept in economic theory–the concept of competition–can fundamentally benefit from insights derived exclusively from analytical action theory broadly conceived. In doing so, the paper delivers on an old Austrian promise: it is sometimes claimed that Austrian economists understand competition better than most economists. This may be a bold claim, since Austrian economists have neither traced the understanding of subjectivity to its very origin (the theory of intentionality), nor have they traced their sympathy for methodological individualism in relation to market processes to its very ground (the theory of (human) action). This paper aims to fill this gap. Moreover, by grounding an Austrian view of competition in analytic action theory, it succeeds in avoiding the serious problems of the dominant equilibrium approach. By explaining competition as rivalry, the paper draws on the philosophy and logic of human action to bring the (economic) agent back into play. In this way, a case is made for an integrated view of Austrian theory as an amalgam of Austrian economics and analytic action theory.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Acemoglu, D., Laibson, D.I. and List, J.A., 2016. Microeconomics, Pearson series in economics. Boston: Pearson.
Ackerman, F. and Nadal, A., eds., 2004. The Flawed Foundations of General Equilibrium: Critical Essays on Economic Theory, Routledge frontiers of political economy, 62. London: Routledge.
Ajdukiewicz, K., 1935. Die syntaktische Konnexität. Studia Philosophica, 1, pp.1–27.
Anscombe, G.E.M., 1957. Intention. 1st ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Aristotle, 1938. Categories. On Interpretation. Prior Analytics (H.P. Cooke and H. Tredennick, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Available at: <https://www.loebclassics.com/view/LCL325/1938/volume.xml> [visited on 14 October 2024].
Armentano, D.T., 1972. The Myths of Antitrust: Economic Theory and Legal Cases. New Rochelle, N.Y: Arlington House.
Arrow, K.J. and Debreu, G., 1954. Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy. Econometrica, 22(3), pp.265–290. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907353.
Aumann, R.J., 1964. Markets with a Continuum of Traders. Econometrica, 32(1/2), pp.39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913732.
Barrotta, P., 1996. A Neo-Kantian Critique of Von Mises’s Epistemology. Economics & Philosophy, 12(1), pp.51–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267100003710.
Boettke, P.J., 1990. The Political Economy of Soviet Socialism: The Formative Years, 1918–1928. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3433-2.
Brentano, F., 1874. Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkte. Leipzig: Verlag von Duncker & Humblot. Available at: <https://archive.org/details/psychologievome02brengoog>.
Brentano, F., 2009. Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint. Ed. by O. Kraus and L.L. McAlister (A.C. Rancurello, D. Terrell and L.L. McAlister, Trans.), International Library of Philosophy. Taylor & Francis.
Bryant, W.D.A., ed., 2010. General Equilibrium: Theory and Evidence. Singapore; Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific Pub. Co.
Burge, T., 2010. Origins of Objectivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199581405.001.0001.
Burton-Roberts, N., 2016. Analysing Sentences: An Introduction to English Syntax. 4th ed., Learning about Language. London; New York: Routledge.
Carnap, R., 1963. Intellectual Autobiography. The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, The Library of living philosophers. La Salle, IL: Open Court, pp.3–84.
Coase, R.H., 1972. Durability and Monopoly. The Journal of Law and Economics, 15(1), pp.143–149. https://doi.org/10.1086/466731.
Condic, S.B. and Morefield, R., 2021. Hayek on the essential dispersion of market knowledge. The Review of Austrian Economics, 34(4), pp.449–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-019-00487-4.
Crane, T., 1998. Intentionality as the Mark of the Mental. In: A. O’Hear, ed. Contemporary Issues in the Philosophy of Mind, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.229–252. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511563744.013.
Crane, T., 2001. Elements of Mind: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Crane, T., 2013. The Objects of Thought. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Davidson, D., 1963. Actions, reasons, and causes. The Journal of Philosophy, 60(23), pp.685–700. Available at: <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2023177> [visited on 11 November 2024].
Davidson, D., 2001. Actions, Reasons, and Causes [1963]. Essays on Actions and Events. 2nd ed., Philosophical Essays of Donald Davidson. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, pp.3–19.
De Haro, S., 2020. Science and Philosophy: A Love–Hate Relationship. Foundations of Science, 25(2), pp.297–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-019-09619-2.
Ditmarsch, H.v., Halpern, J.Y., Hoek, W.v.d. and Kooi, B.P., eds., 2015. Handbook of Epistemic Logic. London: College publications.
Ebeling, R.M., 1993. Economic Calculation Under Socialism: Ludwig von Mises and His Predecessors. In: J.M. Herbener, ed. The Meaning of Ludwig von Mises. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp.56–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2176-7_3.
Edgeworth, F.Y., 1881. Mathematical Psychics. London: Kegan Paul & Co. Available at: <https://historyofeconomicthought.mcmaster.ca/edgeworth/mathpsychics.pdf> [visited on 14 October 2024].
Flanigan, J., 2016. Obstetric Autonomy and Informed Consent. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 19(1), pp.225–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-015-9610-8.
Frankfurt, H.G., 1978. The Problem of Action. American Philosophical Quarterly, 15(2), pp.157–162. Available at: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/20009708> [visited on 14 October 2024].
Frege, G., 1891. Function und Begriff: Vortrag, gehalten in der Sitzung vom 9. Januar 1891 der Jenaischen Gesellschaft für Medicin und Naturwissenschaft. Jena: Pohle. Available at: <https://gdz.sub.uni-goettingen.de/id/PPN64299370X> [visited on 16 October 2024].
Frege, G., 1953. The Foundations of Arithmetic: A Logico-Mathematical Enquiry into the Concept of Number. Rev. New York: Harper and Brothers.
Frege, G., 1960. Function and concept. Translations from the Philosophical Writings (P.T. Geach and M. Black, Trans.). 2nd ed. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp.21–41.
Friedman, M., 1966. The Methodology of Positive Economics. Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago; London: Chicago University Press, pp.3–43.
Fumerton, R., 2017. Epistemology and Science: Some Metaphilosophical Reflections. Philosophical Topics, 45(1), pp.1–16. Available at: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/26529422> [visited on 15 October 2024].
Hayek, F.A.v., 1945. The Use of Knowledge in Society. The American Economic Review, 35(4), pp.519–530. Available at: <https://www.kysq.org/docs/Hayek_45.pdf> [visited on 20 September 2024].
Hayek, F.A., 1948. Economics and Knowledge. Individualism and Economic Order. London: Routledge, pp.33–56.
Hintikka, J., 1962. Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions, Contemporary philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Husserl, E., 1913. Prolegomena zur reinen Logik. Halle: Max Niemeyer.
Jennings, B., 2009. Agency and Moral Relationship in Dementia. Metaphilosophy, 40(3-4), pp.425–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01591.x.
Khan, M.A., 2008. Perfect Competition. In: Palgrave Macmillan, ed. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp.1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1633-2.
Kirzner, I.M., 1995. The Subjectivism of Austrian Economics. In: G. Meijer, ed. New Perspectives on Austrian Economics. London: Routledge, pp.11–22.
Kirzner, I.M., 2016. The History and Importance of the Austrian Theory of the Market Process. Available at: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvE4zEfrv0k> [visited on 15 October 2024].
Knight, F.H., 1921. Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Available at: <https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/knight-risk-uncertainty-and-profit> [visited on 15 October 2024].
Knudsen, C., 2004. Alfred schutz, Austrian Economists and the Knowledge Problem. Rationality and Society, 16(1), pp.45–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463104036622.
Kurrild-Klitgaard, P., 2001. On Rationality, Ideal Types and Economics: Alfred Schüutz and the Austrian School. The Review of Austrian Economics, 14(2), pp.119–143. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011199831428.
Lachmann, L.M., 1982. Ludwig von Mises and the Extension of Subjectivism. In: I.M. Kirzner, ed. Method, Process, and Austrian Economics: Essays in Honor of Ludwig Von Mises. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, pp.31–40.
Lavoie, D., 2015. Rivalry and Central Planning: The Socialist Calculation Debate Reconsidered, Advanced studies in political economy. Arlington, Virginia: Mercatus Center, George Mason University.
Lemmon, E., 1965. Begining Logic. London: Thomas Nelson and Sons Limited.
Lewis, D., 1970. General semantics. Synthese, 22(1), pp.18–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413598.
Lyons, J., 1968. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165570.
Mankiw, N.G., 2020. Principles of Economics. 9th ed. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning, Inc.
Mankiw, N.G. and Taylor, M.P., 2014. Economics. 3rd ed. Andover: Cengage Learning.
Marshall, A., 1890. Principles of Economics. London; New York: Macmillan and Company.
Mas-Colell, A., 1974. An equilibrium existence theorem without complete or transitive preferences. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1(3), pp.237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4068(74)90015-9.
McKenzie, L.W., 1954. On Equilibrium in Graham’s Model of World Trade and Other Competitive Systems. Econometrica, 22(2), pp.147–161. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907539.
McKenzie, L.W., 1981. The Classical Theorem on Existence of Competitive Equilibrium. Econometrica, 49(4), pp.819–841. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912505.
Mele, A., 2010. Weakness of will and akrasia. Philosophical Studies, 150(3), pp.391–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-009-9418-2.
Mill, J.S., 1848. Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy. Boston: Charles C. Little & John Brown.
Minio-Paluello, L., ed., 1961. Aristoteles latinus. I:1-5 Categoriae vel Praedicamenta, Corpus philosophorum medii aevi. Leiden: Brill.
Mises, L.v., 1962. The Ultimate of Foundation of Economic Science: An Essay on Method, William Vilker Fund Series in the Humane Studies. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand Comp.
Mises, L.v., 1998. Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. Scholar’s ed. Auburn AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Motta, M., 2004. Competition Policy: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804038.
Nagel, T., 1979. Subjective and Objective. Mortal Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.196–213.
Nell, G.L., 2010. Competition as market progress: An Austrian rationale for agent-based modeling. The Review of Austrian Economics, 23(2), pp.127–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-009-0088-2.
O’Brien, E.b.L. and Soteriou, M., eds., 2009. Mental Actions. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Oliva Córdoba, M., 2017. Uneasiness and Scarcity: An Analytic Approach Towards Ludwig von Mises’s Praxeology. Axiomathes, 27(5), pp.521–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-017-9352-4.
Petri, F. and Hahn, F., eds., 2003. General Equilibrium: Problems and Prospects, Routledge Siena studies in political economy. London: Routledge.
Pindyck, R.S. and Rubinfeld, D.L., 2013. Microeconomics. 8th ed. Boston: Pearson.
Plato, 1921. Plato in Twelve Volumes: Vol. 12: Theaetetus (H.N. Fowler, Trans.), Loeb classical library. London; Cambridge: W. Heinemann; Harvard University Press.
Prendergast, C., 1986. Alfred Schutz and the Austrian School of Economics. American Journal of Sociology, 92(1), pp.1–26. https://doi.org/10.1086/228461.
Rajagopalan, S. and Rizzo, M.J., 2019. Austrian Perspectives in Law and Economics. In: A. Marciano and G.B. Ramello, eds. Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. New York, NY: Springer, pp.92–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_621.
Richardson, S.S., 2009. The Left Vienna Circle, Part 1. Carnap, Neurath, and the Left Vienna Circle thesis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 40(1), pp.14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2008.12.002.
Safra, Z., 1989. Strategic Reallocation of Endowments. In: J. Eatwell, M. Milgate and P. Newman, eds. Game Theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp.225–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20181-5_27.
Samuelson, P.A., 1947. Foundations of Economic Analysis, Harvard economic studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Samuelson, P.A., 1964. Theory and Realism: A Reply. The American Economic Review, 54(5), pp.736–739. Available at: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/1818572> [visited on 15 October 2024].
Samuelson, P.A., 1966. Modern Economic Realities and Individualism. In: J.E. Stiglitz, ed. The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul a. Samuelson. Vol. 2. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp.1407–1418.
Samuelson, P.A. and Nordhaus, W.D., 2009. Economics. 19. ed, The McGraw-Hill series economics. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
Schütz, A., 1953. Common-Sense and Scientific Interpretation of Human Action. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 14(1), pp.1–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/2104013.
Schütz, A., 1996. Political Economy: Human Conduct in Social Life. Collected Papers: Volume IV. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp.93–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1077-0_10.
Simons, P., 2009. Introduction to the second edition. In: O. Kraus and L.L. McAlister, eds. Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint (A.C. Rancurello, D. Terrell and L.L. McAlister, Trans.), International Library of Philosophy. Taylor & Francis, pp.xiii–xx.
Smith, A., 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Vol. 1. London: W. Strahan & T. Cadell. Available at: <https://books.google.pl/books?id=jRNDAAAAcAAJ> [visited on 16 October 2024].
Stigler, G.J., 1957. Perfect Competition, Historically Contemplated. Journal of Political Economy, 65(1), pp.1–17. https://doi.org/10.1086/257878.
Stiglitz, J.E. and Walsh, C.E., 2006. Economics. 4th ed. New York: W.W. Norton.
Storr, V.H., 2019. Ludwig Lachmann’s peculiar status within Austrian economics. The Review of Austrian Economics, 32(1), pp.63–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-017-0403-2.
Tallerman, M., 2015. Understanding Syntax. 4th ed. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315758084.
Wald, A., 1935. Über die eindeutige positive Lösbarkeit der neuen Productionsgleichungen. Ergebnisse eines Mathematischen Kolloquiums, 6, pp.12–20.
Walker, A.F., 1989. The Problem of Weakness of Will. Noűs, 23(5), pp.653–676. https://doi.org/10.2307/2216006.
Walras, L., 2019. Léon Walras, Elements of Theoretical Economics: Or the Theory of Social Wealth. Ed. by D.A. Walker and J.v. Daal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weintraub, E.R., 2011. Retrospectives: Lionel W. McKenzie and the Proof of the Existence of a Competitive Equilibrium. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(2), pp.199–215. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.25.2.199.
Wittgenstein, L., 1922. Tractatus logico-philosophicus, International library of psychology, philosophy and scientific method. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.
Wittgenstein, L., 2013. Tractatus logico-philosophicus (D. Pears and B. McGuinness, Trans.), Routledge Great Minds. London: Routledge.
Wright, G.H.v., 1971. Explanation and Understanding, Contemporary philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Yeager, L.B., 1994. Mises and Hayek on calculation and knowledge. The Review of Austrian Economics, 7(2), pp.93–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01101944.
Zambrano, A., 2017. Patient Autonomy and the Family Veto Problem in Organ Procurement. Social Theory and Practice, 43(1), pp.180–200. Available at: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/24871373> [visited on 15 October 2024].