Model uncertainty: When modeling risk leads to a pretense of knowledge
Main Article Content
Abstract
The main purpose of the paper is to develop a concept of model uncertainty as opposed to the existing and well-established concept of model risk. Up to date the broad literature on probability not only developed complete probability systems, but also correctly noticed limitations of probability calculus. Despite the acknowledgement of such probability restrictions, drawbacks of modeling are often related to model risk. We present an argument here to distinguish a feature limiting models even further: model uncertainty. The tenets of it already exist in the literature on probability, but were not properly emphasized while the idea of model risk was developed. Our plan it to start with a broad overview of the existing knowledge about probability in order to start with fundamental principles. From them we are deriving a new concept of model uncertainty.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Alexander, C. and Sarabia, J.M., 2012. Quantile Uncertainty and Value-at-Risk Model Risk. Risk Analysis, 32(8), pp.1293–1308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01824.x.
Bricmont, J., 2002. Determinism, Chaos and Quantum Mechanics. Institut de Physique Théorique Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. [visited on 8 October 2024].
Fetzer, J.H., 1977. A world of dispositions. Synthese, 34(4), pp.397–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485648.
Fetzer, J.H., 1983. Probability and objectivity in deterministic and indeterministic situations. Synthese, 57(3), pp.367–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064703.
Garrison, R.W., 2001. Time and Money: The Macroeconomics of Capital Structure, Foundations of the market economy. London; New York: Routledge.
Green, T.C. and Figlewski, S., 1999. Market Risk and Model Risk for a Financial Institution Writing Options. The Journal of Finance, 54(4), pp.1465–1499. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00152.
Hauwe, L.v.d., 2007. John Maynard Keynes and Ludwig von Mises on Probability. (technical report). MPRA - Munich Personal RePEc Archive, pp.1–46. [visited on 8 October 2024].
Higgs, R., 1997. Regime Uncertainty: Why the Great Depression Lasted So Long and Why Prosperity Resumed after the War. The Independent Review, 1(4), pp.561–590. [visited on 8 October 2024].
Hoppe, H.-H., 2007. The Limits of Numerical Probability: Frank H. Knight and Ludwig von Mises and The Frequency Interpretation. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 10(1), pp.1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-007-9005-3.
Howson, C., 1995. Theories of Probability. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 46(1), pp.1–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/46.1.1.
Hull, J. and Suo, W., 2002. A Methodology for Assessing Model Risk and Its Application to the Implied Volatility Function Model. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 37(2), p.297. https://doi.org/10.2307/3595007.
Kerkhof, J., Melenberg, B. and Schumacher, H., 2010. Model risk and capital reserves. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(1), pp.267–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.07.025.
Keynes, J.M., 1921. A Treatise on Probability. London: Macmillan and Co. [visited on 8 October 2024].
Keynes, J.M., 1939. Professor Tinbergen’s method. The Economic Journal, 49(195), pp.558–577. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/49.195.558.
Knight, F.H., 1971. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Krüger, L., 1986. Probability as a Theoretical Concept in Physics. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1986(2), pp.273–287. https://doi.org/10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1986.2.192806.
Kyburg, H.E., 1966. Probability and Decision. Philosophy of Science, 33(3), pp.250–261. https://doi.org/10.1086/288097.
Lachmann, L.M., 1976. From Mises to Shackle: An Essay on Austrian Economics and the Kaleidic Society. Journal of Economic Literature, 14(1), pp.54–62. [visited on 8 October 2024].
Lucas, R.E., 1977. Understanding business cycles. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 5, pp.7–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2231(77)90002-1.
McGrattan, E.R. and Prescott, E.C., 2003. The 1929 Stock Market: Irving Fisher Was Right. (technical report). Minneapolis: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. [visited on 8 October 2024].
Mises, L.v., 1966. Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. 3., rev. ed. Chicago: Regnery.
Mises, R.v., 1957. Probability, Statistics and Truth. Ed. by H. Geiringer. 2d rev. English ed. New York: Macmillan Co.
Moser, P.K., 1988. The foundations of epistemological probability. Erkenntnis, 28(2), pp.231–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166444.
Reeves, T.V., 1988. A Theory of Probability. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 39(2), pp.161–182. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/39.2.161.
Salmon, W.C., 1967. The Foundations of Scientific Inference. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5hjqm2.
Samuelson, P.A., 2008. Asymmetric or symmetric time preference and discounting in many facets of economic theory: A miscellany. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 37(2-3), pp.107–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-008-9047-8.
Shackle, G.L.S., 1972. Epistemics & Economics: A Critique of Economic Doctrines. Cambridge: Cambrdige University Press.
Shanks, N., 1993. Time and the propensity interpretation of probability. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 24(2), pp.293–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00764391.
Stiglitz, J.E., Orszag, J.M. and Orszag, P.R., 2002. Implications of the New Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Risk-based Capital Standard. Fannie Mae Papers, 1(2), pp.1–10.
Swinburne, R.G., 1971. The Probability of Particular Events. Philosophy of Science, 38(3), pp.327–343. https://doi.org/10.1086/288374.
Taleb, N.N., 2007. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. New York: Random House.
Tucker, W.T., 1965. Max Weber’s Verstehen. The Sociological Quarterly, 6(2), pp.157–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1965.tb01649.x.