A praxeology of the value of life. A critique of Rothbard’s argument
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The present paper aims to study the issue of the value of life in Murray N. Rothbard’s work, and to examine his argument for the contention that “life should be an objective ultimate value” and that “the preservation and furtherance of one’s life takes on the stature of an incontestable axiom.” Rothbard’s assumptions and presuppositions are investigated and critically assessed. Using conceptual and logical analysis rooted mostly in the praxeological method of economics (as developed by Mises and Rothbard himself) and the theory of value (Scheffler, Raz, Elzenberg), it is demonstrated that Rothbard’s account is fallacious both on its own as well as on broader theoretical grounds. It is argued that what Rothbard could—under his specific assumptions about valuing—correctly claim is only that an actor values life to some extent, rather than that life has an objective ultimate value or preservation and furtherance of one’s life has an axiomatic status. The theoretical argument is supported by empirical illustration from suicide terrorism. The paper submits that Rothbard’s position on the value of life is unsound, and that using his argumentation as it stands cannot succeed.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Alakoc, B.P., 2017. When suicide kills: an empirical analysis of the lethality of suicide terrorism. International Journal of Conflict and Violence (IJCV), pp.1–15. https://doi.org/10.4119/IJCV-3089.
Asthappan, J., 2010. The effectiveness of suicide terrorism. Business and Public Administration Studies, 5(2), pp.16–16. Available at: <https://www.bpastudies.org/index.php/bpastudies/article/view/126>.
BBC, 2019. German police arrest 10 people on suspicion of planning islamist attack. Available at: <https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-47677657>.
Bruce, G., 2013. Intrinsic and external factors and influences on the motivation of suicide attackers. Journal of Military and Veterans’ Health, 21(3), pp.27–33. Available at: <https://jmvh.org/article/motivation-of-suicide-attackers/>.
Child, J.W., 1994. Can libertarianism sustain a fraud standard? Ethics, 104(4), pp.722–738. https://doi.org/10.1086/293652.
Crabtree, J., 2006. Terrorist homicide bombings: a primer for preparation: Journal of Burn Care & Research, 27(5), pp.576–588. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BCR.0000235459.60000.A5.
Eabrasu, M., 2013. Rothbard’s and Hoppe’s justifications of libertarianism: A critique. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 12(3), pp.288–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X12460645.
Elzenberg, H., 1990. Wartość i powinność. Etyka, 25, pp.17–45. https://doi.org/10.14394/etyka.739.
Faria, J.R., 2003. Terror cycles. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 7(1), pp.1–11. https://doi.org/10.2202/1558-3708.1102.
Frey, R.G. and Morris, C.W., 1993. Value, welfare, and morality. In: C.W. Morris and R.G. Frey, eds. Value, welfare, and morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.1–12. Available at: <https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/value-welfare-and-morality/value-welfare-and-morality/87F93FB666353C21DC06E1B5757A3B04>.
Grassl, W., 2017. Toward a unified theory of value: from Austrian economics to Austrian philosophy. Axiomathes, 27(5), pp.531–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-017-9348-0.
Harris, J.W., 2002. Rights and resources—libertarians and the right to life. Ratio Juris, 15(2), pp.109–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9337.00200.
Hartford, R., 2017. Ultimate value: self-contradictory. The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies, 17(1), pp.54–67. https://doi.org/10.5325/jaynrandstud.17.1.0054.
Höffe, O., 1991. Gerechtigkeit als tausch? zum politischen projekt der moderne. 1st ed., Würzburger Vorträge zur Rechtsphilosophie, Rechtstheorie und Rechtssoziologie. Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verl.-Ges.
Höffe, O., 1992. ‘Even a nation of devils needs the state’: the dilemma of natural justice. In: H.L. Williams, ed. Essays on Kant’s Political Philosophy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp.120–142. Available at: <https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/E/bo3622618.html>.
Hoppe, H.-H., 1988. From the economics of laissez faire to libertarian ethics. In: W. Block and L.H. Rockwell, eds. The free market reader: essays in the economics of liberty. Auburn AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute, pp.56–76.
Hoppe, H.-H., 1989. A theory of socialism and capitalism: economics, politics, and ethics, The Ludwig von Mises Institute’s studies in Austrian economics. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hoppe, H.-H., 1998. Introduction. The ethics of liberty. New York: New York Univ. Press, pp.xi–xliii.
Hoppe, H.-H., 2007. Democracy - the god that failed: the economics and politics of monarchy, democracy and natural order. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Hülsmann, J.G., 2007. Mises: the last knight of liberalism. Auburn AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Hutchins, R., 2017. Islam and suicide terrorism: separating fact from fiction. Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses, 9(11), pp.7–11. Available at: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/26351566>.
Kinsella, S., 2009. What libertarianism is. In: J.G. Hülsmann and S. Kinsella, eds. Property, Freedom, & Society: Essays in Honor of Hans-Hermann Hoppe. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute, pp.179–196. Available at: <https://mises.org/library/property-freedom-and-society-essays-honor-hans-hermann-hoppe>.
Kruglanski, A.W. et al., 2009. Fully committed: suicide bombers’ motivation and the quest for personal significance. Political Psychology, 30(3), pp.331–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00698.x.
Lindekilde, L., O’Connor, F. and Schuurman, B., 2019. Radicalization patterns and modes of attack planning and preparation among lone-actor terrorists: an exploratory analysis. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 11(2), pp.113–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2017.1407814.
Mack, E., 2022. Natural rights. In: M. Zwolinski and B. Ferguson, eds. The Routledge Companion to Libertarianism, Routledge International Handbooks. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge, pp.13–27.
Meng, J.C.S., 2002. Hopp(e)ing onto new ground: a Rothbardian proposal for Thomistic natural law as the basis for Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s praxeological defense of private property.
Mises, v.L., 2008. Human action: a treatise on economics. Auburn AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Mises, v.L., 2010. Liberalism. Ed. by A. Goddard. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Moen, O., 2012. Is life the ultimate value?: a reassessment of Ayn Rand’s ethics. Reason Papers, 34(2), pp.84–116.
Mroszczyk, J., 2019. To die or to kill? an analysis of suicide attack lethality. Terrorism and Political Violence, 31(2), pp.346–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2016.1228632.
Nozick, R., 1971. On the Randian argument. The Personalist, 52(2), pp.282–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.1971.tb08926.x.
Nozick, R., 1977. On Austrian methodology. Synthese, 36(3), pp.353–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00486025.
Osterfeld, D., 1983. The natural rights debate: a comment on a reply. Journal of Libertarian Studies, 7(1), pp.101–113.
Osterfeld, D., 1986. Freedom, society, and the state: an investigation into the possibility of society without government. San Francisco, CA: Cobden Press.
Porębski, C., 2019. Elzenberg: an unfinished system of axiology. Lectures on polish value theory. Leiden: Brill, pp.73–86. Available at: <https://brill.com/view/title/54133>.
Rasmussen, D.B., 1980. A groundwork for rights: man’s natural end. Journal of Libertarian Studies, 4(1), pp.65–76.
Rasmussen, D.B., 2002. Rand on obligation and value. The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies, 4(1), pp.69–86. Available at: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/41560204>.
Raz, J., 1999. Mixing values. Engaging reason: on the theory of value and action. New York, NY: Oxford Univ. Press, pp.182–201.
Raz, J., 2001. Value, respect, and attachment. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612732>.
Raz, J., 2017. On the moral significance of sacrifice. King’s College London Dickson Poon School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2017-38; Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 55/2017; Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 14-559. Available at: <https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/2051>.
Rothbard, M., 1951. Praxeology: Reply to Mr. Schuller. The American Economic Review, 41(5), pp.943–946. Available at: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/1809097>.
Rothbard, M., 1997. Praxeology, value judgements, and public policy. The logic of action one: method, money, and the austrian school. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp.78–99. Available at: <https://oll-resources.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/oll3/store/titles/104/0724_Bk_Sm.pdf>.
Rothbard, M., 1998. The ethics of liberty. New York: New York University Press.
Rothbard, M., 2006. For a new liberty: the libertarian manifesto. Auburn AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Rothbard, M., 2008. Toward a reconstruction of utility and welfare economics. In: M. Sennholz, ed. On freedom and free enterprise. Auburn AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute, pp.224–262.
Rothbard, M., 2009. Man, economy, and state: a treatise on economic principles; with power and market: government and the economy. 2nd ed. Auburn AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Rothbard, M., 2011. Economic controversies. Auburn AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Roy, O., 2016. Can we understand the motives of jihadists? Pouvoirs, 158(3), pp.15–24. Available at: <https://www.cairn-int.info/article.php?ID_ARTICLE=E_POUV_158_0015>.
Scheffler, S., 2011. Valuing. In: R.J. Wallace, R. Kumar and S. Freeman, eds. Reasons and Recognition: Essays on the Philosophy of T.M. Scanlon. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.23–42. Available at: <https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199753673.003.0002>.
Schroeder, M., 2021. Value theory. In: E.N. Zalta, ed. The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Fall 2021. Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Available at: <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/value-theory/>.
Share, C., 2012. A defense of Rothbardian ethics via a mediation of Hoppe and Rand. The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies, 12(1), pp.117–150. https://doi.org/10.2307/41607996.
Sheehan, I.S., 2014. Are suicide terrorists suicidal? a critical assessment of the evidence. Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience, 11(9-10), pp.81–92.
Slenzok, N., 2018. Dwa argumenty na rzecz libertarianizmu w teorii prawa naturalnego Murraya Rothbarda. Dialogi Polityczne, (22), p.23. https://doi.org/10.12775/DP.2017.002.
Thrasher, J., 2018. Social contractarianism. In: B. Van der Vossen, D. Schmidtz and J. Brennan, eds. The Routledge Handbook of Libertarianism, Routledge handbooks in philosophy. New York: Routledge, pp.212–224.
Waldron, J., 1988. The right to private property. Oxford; New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
Weiss, P., 1949. Sacrifice and self-sacrifice: their warrant and limits. The Review of Metaphysics, 2(7), pp.76–98. Available at: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/20123135>.
Wissenburg, M., 2019. The concept of nature in libertarianism. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 22(3), pp.287–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2019.1652313.
Zimmerman, M.J. and Bradley, B., 2019. Intrinsic vs. extrinsic value. In: E.N. Zalta, ed. The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Spring 2019. Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Available at: <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/value-intrinsic-extrinsic/>.