Free market, blackmail, and Austro-libertarianism
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the present paper we examine the standard Austro-libertarian account of blackmail according to which blackmail should be legal as it does not coerce the blackmailee to part with his property and so cannot be subsumed under extortion. Against this account we put forth a preliminary argument or a hypothesis, if you will, that even if blackmail cannot be subsumed under extortion, it still does not follow that it should be legal, for it might be subsumed under fraud. Indeed, the hypothesis we would like to offer for consideration is that blackmail is fraud, at least under some circumstances. To wit, we claim that even if the blackmailer does not coerce the blackmailee, in cases in which the blackmailer does not have an intention to execute his otherwise legal threats, he nonetheless deceives the blackmailee, thereby inducing him to part with his property. This is fraud and it renders the blackmailee’s property transfer involuntary and invalid. As fraud should be illegal under Austro-libertarianism, so should blackmail.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Aristotle, 1955. The Nicomachean Ethics (J.A.K. Thomson, Trans.). London: Penguin Books. Available at: <http://archive.org/details/theethicsofaristotle> [visited on 26 September 2024].
Block, W. and Anderson, G., 2000. Blackmail, Extortion, and Exchange. NYLS Law Review, 44(3), pp.541–561. Available at: <https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/nyls_law_review/vol44/iss3/9>.
Block, W. and Gordon, D., 1985. Blackmail, Extortion and Free Speech: A Reply to Posner, Epstein, Nozick and Lindgren. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 19(1), p.37. Available at: <https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/llr/vol19/iss1/4>.
Block, W.E., 1998a. A Libertarian Theory of Blackmail: Reply to Leo Katz’s ‘Blackmail and Other Forms of Arm-Twisting’. Irish Jurist, 33, pp.280–310.
Block, W.E., 1998b. Environmentalism and Economic Freedom: The Case for Private Property Rights. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(16), pp.1887–1899. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005941908758.
Block, W.E., 2004. Libertarianism, Positive Obligations and Property Abandonment: Children’s Rights. International Journal of Social Economics, 31(3), pp.275–286. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290410518256.
Block, W.E., 2013. Legalize Blackmail. Chalmette: Straylight Publishing.
Block, W.E., 2015. Natural Rights, Human Rights, and Libertarianism. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 74(1), pp.29–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12086.
Block, W.E., 2018. Defending the Undefendable: The Pimp, Prostitute, Scab, Slumlord, Libeler, Moneylender, and Other Scapegoats in the Rogue’s Gallery of American Society. Auburn AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute. Available at: <https://cdn.mises.org/Defending_the_Undefendable_2018.pdf> [visited on 27 September 2024].
Epstein, R.A., 1975. Unconscionability: A Critical Reappraisal. The Journal of Law and Economics, 18(2), pp.293–315. https://doi.org/10.1086/466814.
Fletcher, G.P., 2000. Rethinking Criminal Law. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Forster, E.M., 1941. Howards End, Penguin modern classics. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books. Available at: <https://archive.org/details/howardsend0000fors_c6m6> [visited on 27 September 2024].
Fraud Act 2006, n.d. Available at: <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/35/contents> [visited on 27 September 2024].
Kadish, S.H., Schulhofer, S.J. and Steiker, C.S., 2007. Criminal Law and Its Processes: Cases and Materials. 8. ed. New York, NY: Aspen Publ.
Locke, J., 1689. Two Treatises of Government in the Former, the False Principles and Foundation of Sir Robert Filmer and His Followers Are Detected and Overthrown, the Latter Is an Essay Concerning the True Original, Extent, and End of Civil Government. London: Printed for Awnsham Churchill at the Black Swan in Ave-Mary-Lane. Available at: <https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A48901.0001.001>.
Locke, J., 2003. Two Treatises of Government. Ed. by P. Laslett, Cambridge texts in the history of political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moore, M.S., 1984. Law and Psychiatry: Rethinking the Relationship. Cambridge: Cambrdige University Press.
Nozick, R., 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Regina v. Théroux, 1993. Available at: <https://canlii.ca/t/1fs40> [visited on 27 September 2024].
Rothbard, M., 1998. The Ethics of Liberty. New York: New York University Press.
Rothbard, M., 2006. For a New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto. Auburn AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Rothbard, M., 2009. Man, Economy, and State: A Treatise on Economic Principles; with Power and Market: Government and the Economy. 2nd ed. Auburn AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Rothbard, M., 2011. Toward a Reconstruction of Utility and Welfare Economics. The Logic of Action: I. Method, Money, and the Austrian School, Economists of the twentieth century. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute, pp.289–333. Available at: <https://mises.org/library/toward-reconstruction-utility-and-welfare-economics-1>.
Steiner, H., 2019. Asymmetric Information, Libertarianism, and Fraud. Review of Social Economy, 77(2), pp.94–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2019.1602280.
Thomson, J.J., 1990. The Realm of Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Williams, G., 1983. Textbook of Criminal Law. 2nd ed. London: Stevens & Sons.