Demonstrated preference in the Austrian economic analysis
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper is an attempt to clarify the concept of demonstrated preference in the economic analysis of the Austrian School of Economics. It considers several interpretations of this concept: (1) as a thymological concept which matters in empirical interpretations of concrete human actions; (2) as a preference expressed in voluntary actions; (3) as the only existing preference; (4) as the only preference which matters in economics; (5) as the only preference which matters in the economy. It is argued that despite the Austrian insistence on (4), the only interpretation resistant to criticism is (5). Unfortunately, it is not sufficient to draw or reinforce the conclusions that Murray N. Rothbard and his followers reach in their considerations on welfare economics, monopoly theory, public goods theory, and game theory. A number of additional clarifications are also made (e.g., the concepts of “voluntariness” and “psychologizing” in economics).
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Anderson, S., 2021. Coercion. In: E.N. Zalta and U. Nodelman, eds. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Summer 2021. Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Available at: <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/coercion/>.
Block, W. and Gordon, D., 1985. Blackmail, Extortion and Free Speech: A Reply to Posner, Epstein, Nozick and Lindgren. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 19(1), p.37. Available at: <https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/llr/vol19/iss1/4>.
Block, W.E., 1980. On Robert Nozick’s ‘On Austrian methodology’. Inquiry, 23(4), pp.397–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201748008601918.
Block, W.E., 1983. Public Goods and Externalities: The Case of Roads. Journal of Libertarian Studies, 7(1), pp.1–34.
Block, W.E., 1995. Ethics, efficiency, Coasian property rights, and psychic income: A reply to Demsetz. The Review of Austrian Economics, 8(2), pp.61–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01102292.
Block, W.E., 1999. Austrian Theorizing: Recalling the Foundations. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 2(4), pp.21–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-999-1029-4.
Block, W.E., 2000. Private-property rights, erroneous interpretations, morality, and economics: Reply to demsetz. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 3(1), pp.63–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-000-1014-4.
Block, W.E., 2005. Value Freedom, Laissez Faire, Mises, and Rothbard: A Comment on Professor Gunning. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 64(3), pp.919–938. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2005.00398.x.
Block, W.E., 2009. Rejoinder to Hoppe on Indifference. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 12(1), pp.52–59. Available at: <http://mises.org/journals/qjae/pdf/qjae12_1_4.pdf> [visited on 15 September 2022].
Block, W.E. and Barnett II, W., 2010. Rejoinder to Hoppe on indifference, once again. Reason Papers, 32, pp.141–154. Available at: <http://reasonpapers.com/pdf/32/rp_32_9.pdf> [visited on 15 September 2022].
Caplan, B., 1999. The Austrian Search for Realistic Foundations. Southern Economic Journal, 65(4), pp.823–838. https://doi.org/10.2307/1061278.
Cordato, R.E., 1992. Welfare Economics and Externalities In An Open Ended Universe: A Modern Austrian Perspective. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2145-4.
Crovelli, M.R., 2006. The Trouble With Axelrod: The Prisoners’ Utility Cannot be Measured or Compared. Available at: <https://mises.org/mises-daily/trouble-axelrod-prisoners-utility-cannot-be-measured-or-compared> [visited on 20 September 2024].
Gordon, D., 2022. Misunderstanding Demonstrated Preference. Available at: <https://mises.org/friday-philosophy/misunderstanding-demonstrated-preference> [visited on 20 September 2024].
Hausman, D.M. and McPherson, M.S., 2006. Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy and Public Policy. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754289.
Hayek, F.A.v., 1945. The Use of Knowledge in Society. The American Economic Review, 35(4), pp.519–530. Available at: <https://www.kysq.org/docs/Hayek_45.pdf> [visited on 20 September 2024].
Hayek, F.A.v., 1952. The Counter-Revolution of Science. Glencoe: Free Press.
Herbener, J.M., 1997. The Pareto rule and welfare economics. The Review of Austrian Economics, 10(1), pp.79–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02538144.
Herbener, J.M., 2008. In Defense of Rothbardian Welfare Economics. New Perspectives on Political Economy, 04(1), pp.53–78. https://doi.org/10.62374/z18cxq72.
High, J., 1985. Is Economics Independent of Ethics? Reason Papers, 10, pp.3–16. Available at: <https://reasonpapers.com/pdf/10/rp_10_1.pdf> [visited on 20 September 2024].
Hoppe, H.-H., 1989. A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism: Economics, Politics, and Ethics, The Ludwig von Mises Institute’s studies in Austrian economics. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hoppe, H.-H., 2005. A Note on Preference and Indifference in Economic Analysis. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 8(4), pp.87–91. Available at: <https://cdn.mises.org/qjae8_4_6.pdf> [visited on 20 September 2024].
Hoppe, H.-H., 2006. The Economics and Ethics of Private Property. 2nd ed. Auburn AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Hoppe, H.-H., 2009. Further Notes on Preference and Indifference: Rejoinder to Block. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 12(1), pp.60–64. Available at: <https://cdn.mises.org/qjae12_1_5.pdf> [visited on 15 September 2022].
Hülsmann, J.G., 2004. The a priori foundations of property economics. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 7(4), pp.41–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-004-1003-0.
Kirzner, I.M., 1973. Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Available at: <https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/C/bo27304815.html> [visited on 20 September 2024].
Kirzner, I.M., 1994. Value-freedom. In: P. Boettke, ed. The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics. Edward Elgard Publishing, pp.313–319. Available at: <https://ideas.repec.org//h/elg/eechap/53_45.html> [visited on 20 September 2024].
Kvasnička, M., 2008. Rothbard’s Welfare Theory: A Critique. New Perspectives on Political Economy, 4(1), pp.41–52.
Lachmann, L., 1971. The Legacy of Max Weber. Berkeley: The Glendessary Press.
Long, R.T., 2008. Wittgenstein, Austrian Economics, and the Logic of Action: Praxeological Investigations. Auburn University. Available at: <http://praxeology.net/wiggy-draft.pdf> [visited on 20 September 2024].
Machaj, M., 2007. A praxeological case for homogeneity and indifference. New Perspectives on Political Economy, 3(2), pp.231–238.
Machaj, M., 2014. Murray Rothbard, najważniejszy austriacki ekonomista? Ekonomia, 20(2), pp.9–22. Available at: <https://wuwr.pl/ekon/article/view/8383> [visited on 20 September 2024].
Mäki, U., 2008. Realism. In: D.M. Hausman, ed. The Philosophy of Economics: An Anthology. 3rd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.431–438.
Martin, A., 2015. Austrian Methodology: A Review and Synthesis. In: C.J. Coyne and P. Boettke, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Austrian Economics. Oxford University Press, pp.12–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199811762.013.2.
Megger, D. and Wysocki, I., 2023. Coercion, voluntary exchange, and the Austrian School of Economics. Synthese, 201(1), p.8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-04005-1.
Mises, L.v., 1962. Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis (J. Kahane, Trans.). New Haven: Yale University Press. Available at: <https://cdn.mises.org/Socialism%20An%20Economic%20and%20Sociological%20Analysis_3.pdf> [visited on 20 September 2024].
Mises, L.v., 1998. Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. Scholar’s ed. Auburn AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Mises, L.v., 2007. Theory and History: An Interpretation of Social and Economic Evolution. Auburn AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Nozick, R., 1977. On Austrian Methodology. Synthese, 36(3), pp.353–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00486025.
Prychitko, D.L., 1993. Formalism in Austrian-school welfare economics: Another pretense of knowledge? Critical Review, 7(4), pp.567–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913819308443319.
Rothbard, M., 1995. The present state of Austrian economics. Journal des Économistes et des Études Humaines, 6(1), pp.43–90.
Rothbard, M., 2009a. Man, Economy, and State: A Treatise on Economic Principles; with Power and Market: Government and the Economy. 2nd ed. Auburn AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Rothbard, M., 2009b. Power and the Market. Man, Economy, and State: A Treatise on Economic Principles; with Power and Market: Government and the Economy. 2nd ed. Auburn AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute, pp.1047–1369.
Rothbard, M., 2011a. The Present State of Austrian Economics. The Logic of Action: I. Method, Money, and the Austrian School, Economists of the twentieth century. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute, pp.161–223. Available at: <https://mises.org/library/toward-reconstruction-utility-and-welfare-economics-1>.
Rothbard, M.N., 2011b. Praxeology as the Method of the Social Sciences [1963]. Economic Controversies. Auburn AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute, pp.29–58.
Searle, J.R., 1984. Minds, Brains and Science, Reith Lectures, 1984. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
Wiśniewski, J., 2018. The Economics of Law, Order, and Action: The Logic of Public Goods, Routledge advances in heterodox economics. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Wiśniewski, J.B., 2014. The methodology of the Austrian school of economics: The present state of knowledge. Available at: <https://repozytorium.uni.wroc.pl/dlibra/publication/101598/edition/96350> [visited on 20 September 2024].
Wysocki, I., 2016. Indifference – in defense of orthodoxy. Societas et Ius, (5), pp.15–30. https://doi.org/10.12775/SEI.2016.002.
Wysocki, I., 2017. A Note on Block-Hoppe Debate on Indifference. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 20(4), pp.360–365. Available at: <https://mises.org/library/note-block-hoppe-debate-indifference> [visited on 9 January 2023].
Wysocki, I., 2021. An Austro-Libertarian Theory of Voluntariness: A Critique. Toruń: Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu. Wydawnictwo Wydziału Nauk o Polityce i Bezpieczeństwie. [visited on 7 October 2024].
Wysocki, I., Block, W.E. and Dominiak, Ł., 2019. Rothbard’s Welfare Theory: Some Support. New Perspectives on Political Economy, 15(1-2), pp.18–35. https://doi.org/10.62374/jbdvra16.