Quantum mechanics of identical particles
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Leibniz’s principium identitatis indiscernibilium excludes the existence of two different objects possessing all properties identical. Although perfectly acceptable for macroscopic systems, it becomes questionable in quantum mechanics, where the concept of identical particles is quite natural and has measurable consequences. On the other hand, Leibniz’s principle seems to be indispensable when we want to individuate an item and ascribe to it particular property (e.g. value of the projection of spin on a chosen axis). We may thus abandon the principle on the quantum level, claiming it falsity here, or (better) try to find other ways of individuation of objects, possibly by adopting appropriately the very concept of it. All these problems, and many other connected with identity and indiscernibility of quantum objects, are thoroughly discussed in the book of Tomasz Bigaj, unique in the world literature due to its comprehensiveness.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Bigaj, T., 2022. Identity and Indiscernibility in Quantum Mechanics. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Black, M., 1952. The Identity of Indiscernibles. Mind [Online], 61(242), pp.153–164. Available at: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/2252291> [visited on 12 September 2022].
Castellani, E. and Mittelstaedt, P., 2000. Leibniz’s Principle, Physics, and the Language of Physics. Foundations of Physics [Online], 30(10), pp.1587–1604. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026489931449.
Caulton, A., 2014. Qualitative Individuation in Permutation-Invariant Quantum Mechanics [Online]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1409.0247.
Caulton, A., 2015. Is Mereology Empirical? Composition for Fermions. In: T. Bigaj and C. Wüthrich, eds. Metaphysics in Contemporary Physics [Online]. Brill, pp.293–321. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004310827_013.
Cortes, A., 1976. Leibniz’s Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles: A False Principle. Philosophy of Science [Online], 43(4), pp.491–505. Available at: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/187115> [visited on 12 September 2022].
French, S. and Redhead, M., 1988. Quantum Physics and the Identity of Indiscernibles. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science [Online], 39(2), pp.233–246. Available at: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/687269> [visited on 12 September 2022].
Ginsberg, A., 1981. Quantum Theory and the Identity of Indiscernibles Revisited. Philosophy of Science [Online], 48(3), pp.487–491. Available at: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/186992> [visited on 12 September 2022].
Guay, A. and Pradeu, T., eds., 2016. Individuals Across the Sciences. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Redhead, M. and Teller, P., 1992. Particle Labels and the Theory of Indistinguishable Particles in Quantum Mechanics. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science [Online], 43(2), pp.201–218. Available at: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/687872> [visited on 12 September 2022].
Saunders, S., 2003. Physics and Leibniz’s Principles. In: K. Brading and E. Castellani, eds. Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections. Cambridge, U.K.; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp.289–307.