Can we remain rational in the large world? On some unexpected consequences of ecological rationality.

Main Article Content

Marcin Gorazda

Abstract

The paper outlines various concepts of rationality, their characteristics and consequences. In the first, most general part, the metaphysical, instrumental and discursive rationality is distinguished. The following part focuses on instrumental rationality and the rational choice theory and ordinal and cardinal utility, expected utility and game theory, respectively. All those concepts are summarised as being the most mathematically elegant and mostly decidable and helpful in the decision-making process. Giving primacy to individual preferences and withholding the judgment on their “objective” value, they are also devoid of double standards. They are, however, strongly normative and weakly coincide with actual agents’ behaviour. Empirical findings on agents’ decision making seem to demonstrate their irrationality, unless we introduce into the analysis different concepts of rationality, namely based on costs efficient heuristics, inclusive fitness and ecological rationality. They are discussed respectively, and although they seem better to explain the set of humans’ seemingly irrational behaviour, they are likely weak in predicting that behaviour. They are also losing their normative dimension and thus cease to be helpful in decision making. Applying the particular theory of rationality, either descriptively or normatively, seems to depend strongly on the environment, which can be characterised by its extension from a small to a large world. The more the small world’s features an environment reveals the more effective is the application of the particular model of rationality. Beyond the small worlds, rule stochasticity, underspecification and misspecification and the only reasonable method are consecutive trials and errors, which eventually may reduce the large world to the small one.

Article Details

How to Cite
Gorazda, M. (2021). Can we remain rational in the large world? On some unexpected consequences of ecological rationality. Philosophical Problems in Science (Zagadnienia Filozoficzne W Nauce), (71), 75–105. Retrieved from https://zfn.edu.pl/index.php/zfn/article/view/557
Section
Articles

References

Alexy, R., 1992. A Discource-Theoretical Conception of Prectical Reason. Ratio Juris, Issue 5, pp. 231-251.
Arlen, J. H. i Talley, E. L. redaktorzy, 2008. Experimental Law and Economics (Economic Approaches to Law). New York: Edward Edgar Pub.
Becker, G. S., 1981. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge. Massachusetts, London: Harvard University Press.
Becker, G. S., 1981. Altruism in the Family and Selfishness in the Market Place. Economica, Feb, 48(189), pp. 1-15.
Beinhocker, E. D., 2013. Reflexivity, complexity, and the nature of social science. Journal of Economic Methodology, 20(4), pp. 330-342.
Brożek, B., 2007. Rationality and discource. Towards a normative model of applying law.. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
Churchland, P. S., 2011. Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us about Morality. Prineton: Princeton University Press.
Dawkins, R., 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dewey, J., 1924. Logical Method and Law. Cornell Law Review, December, 10(1), pp. 17-27.
Dobzhansky, T., 1973. Nothing in Biology Makes Sense except in the Light of Evolution. The American Biology Teacher, March, 35(3), pp. 125-129.
El Mouden, C., Burton-Chellew, M., Gardner, A. i West, S. A., 2012. What do humans maximize?. W: S. Okasha i K. Binmore, redaktorzy Evolution and Rationality. Decision, Co-operation and Strategic Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 23-49.
Frank, R. H., Gilovich, T. i Regan, D. T., 1993. Does Studying Economics Inhibit Cooperation?. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(2), pp. 159-171.
Gigerenzer, G., 2000. Adaptive Thinking. Rationality in the Real World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gigerenzer, G. i Brighton, H., 2009. Homo Heuristicus: Why Biased Minds Make Better Inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science, January, 1(1), pp. 107-143.
Gigerenzer, G. i Todd, P. M., 1999. Ecological rationality: the normative study of heuristics. W: G. Gigerenzer i P. M. Todd, redaktorzy Ecological Rationality: Intelligence in the World. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 487-497.
Gintis, H., 2012. An evolutionary perspective on the unification of the behavioral sciences. W: S. Okasha i K. Binmore, redaktorzy Evolution and Rationality. Decision, Co-operation and Strategic Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 213-245.
Gorazda, M., 2009. Pragmatyzm wiary. Jeffa Jordana chybione i trafne argumenty za racjonalnością postawy teistycznej. Logos i Ethos, 26(1), pp. 53-72.
Gorazda, M., 2017. Law as a means to an end. Undecidability of the end problem. Polish Law Review, December, 3(1), pp. 63-79.
Gorazda, M. i Kwarciński, T., 2020. Między dobrobytem a szczęściem. Eseje z filozofii ekonomii. Kraków: Copernicus Center Press.
Hamilton, W. D., 1964. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology, July, 7(1), pp. 1-16.
Hare, B. i Woods, V., 2020. Survival of the Friendliest. Understanding Our Origins and Rediscovering Our Common Humanity. New York: Penguine Random House.
Harman, O., 2010. The Price of Altruism: George Price and the Search for the Origins of Kindness. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Hausman, D. M. i McPherson, M. S., 2006. Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy and Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Henrich, J., 2020. The Weirdest People in the World. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giraux.
Henrich, J. i inni, 2001. In Search of Homo Economicus: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small-Scale Societies. The American Economic Review, May, 91(2), pp. 73-78.
Hobbes, T., 2010. Lewiatan. Warszawa: Aletheia.
Hume, D., 2000. A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jordan, J., 2006. Pascal's Wager: Pragmatic Arguments and Belief in God. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kahneman, D., 2011. Thinking Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kahneman, D. i Tversky, A., 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, Issue 47, pp. 313-327.
Keynes, J. M., 2009. The General Theory Of Employment, Interest, And Money. New York: Classic Books America.
Kowalski, R. i Kwarciński, T., 2016. Racjonalność, użyteczność, dobrobyt. W: M. Gorazda, Ł. Hardt i T. Kwarciński, redaktorzy Metaekonomia. Zagadnienia z filozofii ekonomii. Kraków: Copernicus Center Press.
Law, R., 1979. Optimal Life Histories Under Age-Specific Predation. The American Naturalist, September, 114(3), pp. 399-417.
Lo, A. W., 2017. Adaptive Market. Financial Evolution at the Speed of Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mill, J. S., 2008. On the Definition and Method of Political Economy. W: The Philosophy of Economics. An Anthology.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 41-58.
Moore, G. E., 2004. Principia Ethica. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications.
Nowak - Posadzy, K., 2016. Refleksyjność w ekonomii. W: M. Gorazda, Ł. Hardt i T. Kwarciński, redaktorzy Metaekonomia. Zagadnienia z filozofii ekonomii. Kraków: Copernicus Center Press.
Pascal, B., 2003. Pensees. London: Penguin UK.
Posner, R. A., 1972. Economic analysis of law. Michigan: Little, Brown.
Pound, R., 1997. Social control through law. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Richerson, P. J. i Boyd, R., 2005. Not by Genes Alone. How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Kindle edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Schermer, M., 2008. The Mind of the Market: Compassionate Apes, Competitive Humans, and Other Tales from Evolutionary Economics. New York: Times Books. Henry Holt & Company.
Sen, A. K., 2003. Rationality and Freedom. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Simon, H. A., 1955. A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, February, 69(1), pp. 99-118.
Soros, G., 2013. Fallibility, reflexivity, and the human uncertainty principle. Journal of Economic Methodology, 20(4), pp. 309-329.
Stelmach, J., Brożek, B. i Załuski, W., 2007. Dziesięć wykładów o ekonomii prawa. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
Straffin, P. D., 2002. Game Theory and Strategy. Washington D.C.: The Mathematical Association of America.
Straffin, P. D., 2004. Teoria gier. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe "Scholar".
Tullock, G. i Buchanan, J. M., 1999. The Calculus of Consent. Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
Valverde, P., Healy, E., Rees, J. L. i Thody, A. J., 1995. Variants of the melanocyte–stimulating hormone receptor gene are associated with red hair and fair skin in humans. Nature Genetics, 1 November, Tom 11, pp. 328-220.
Veblen, T., 1898. Why is Economics not an Evolutionary Science?. [Online]
Available at: http://archive.org/details/jstor-1882952
[Data uzyskania dostępu: 21 08 2013].
Veblen, T., 1994. The Theory of the Leisure Class. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications Ltd..
von Neumann, J. i Morgenstern, O., 1941. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
von Petersdorff, W. i Bernau, P., 2013. Denkfehler, die uns Geld kosten: Warum wir immer das Falsche tun und andere sich ins Fäustchen lachen. Kolonia: Bastei Luebbe.
Wszołek, S., 2004. Wprowadzenie do filozofii religii. Kraków: Wydawnictwo WAM.