The problem of indifference and homogeneity in Austrian economics: Nozick’s challenge revisited

Main Article Content

Igor Wysocki


The pivotal point in the Austrian literature on homogeneity, choice and indifference was constituted by Nozick’s On Austrian Methodology. Nozick provoked a long debate on the above notions within Austrianism. The aim of this paper is to elaborate such an account of homogeneity that would take the sting out of Nozick’s challenge and allow for non-trivial formulation of the law of diminishing marginal utility. Hence, we shall first take a closer look at the debate on indifference within the Austrian camp, while defending and building upon the Hoppean account vis-à-vis Block’s criticism. Our justification of the Hoppean position shall consist in showing that his account of the correct description of an action is not an ad hoc move aimed at solving just one problem of indifference but is highly intuitive and widely applicable. We conclude by restating the above-mentioned law, thus demonstrating that the Nozickian objection can be successfully replied.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wysocki, I. (2021). The problem of indifference and homogeneity in Austrian economics: Nozick’s challenge revisited. Philosophical Problems in Science (Zagadnienia Filozoficzne W Nauce), (71), 9–44. Retrieved from


Block, W. E. 1980. “On Robert Nozick’s ‘On Austrian Methodology’”. Inquiry 23 (4): 397-444.
__________. 1999. “Austrian theorizing: recalling the foundations”. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 2, no. 4: 21-29.
__________. 2009. “Rejoinder to Hoppe on indifference”. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics; Vol. 12, No. 1: 52–59
Block, W. E. with William Barnett II. 2010. “Rejoinder to Hoppe on indifference, once again”. Reason Papers, Vol. 32, pp. 141-154
Davidson, D. 1963. “Actions, reasons and causes”. The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 60, No. 23: 685-700.
__________. 2001. “Agency”. In: Essays on Actions and Events (pp. 43-61), Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hoppe, H.-H. 2005. “Must Austrians embrace indifference?”. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 8, no. 4: 87–91.
Hudík, M. 2011. “A note on Nozick's problem”. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 14, No. 2: 256-260.
Machaj, M. 2007. “A praxeological case for homogeneity and indifference”. New Perspectives in Political Economy, Vol. 3, No. 2: 231-238.
Menger, C. 2007. Principles of economics. Auburn AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Nozick, R. 1977. “On Austrian Methodology” Synthese no. 36: 353-392.
Parfit, Derek. 2011. On What Matters. Volume 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rothbard, M., N. 2009. Man, Economy and State. Auburn AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute, Scholar’s Edition.
____________. 2011. “Toward a reconstruction of utility and welfare economics”. In: Economic Controversies (pp. 289-333), Auburn AL: Ludwig von Mises Instittute.
Searle, John. 1984. Minds, Brains and Science. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Von Mises, L. 1998. Human Action. Scholar's Edition, Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.