Cognitive aspects of the philosophical and theological coherence of the concept of a miracle within the contemporary scientific world view
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to investigate the philosophical and theological validity and coherence of the classical concept of a miracle within the contemporary scientific world view. The main tool in this process will be the cognitive standard model of the formation of religious beliefs operative in the cognitive science of religion. The application of this model shows why an intentional agent is assigned as responsible for the occurrence of events with no visible cause such as a miracle: miracles are events that violate the intuitively expected behaviors observable in the physical reality. It will become evident that much of the conceptual content of the classical understanding of miracles can be retained despite of the ontological and epistemological challenges of the contemporary science. In particular, this concerns the semantic view of miracles in which a miracle does not occur as an objective Divine intervention but qualifies as religious interpretation of the natural course of events always in reference to a cultural and personal context that is unique to those who directly experience these events either as direct recipients or as observers.
Article Details
References
Aquinas, T., 1952. On the Power of God (De Potentia Dei) [Online]. Westminster, MD: The Newman Press. Available at: <https://isidore.co/aquinas/QDdePotentia.htm> [visited on 27 August 2021].
Aquinas, T., 1968. On Being and Essence (A. Maurer, Trans.). 1st ed. Toronto: The Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
Aquinas, T., 1975. Summa Contra Gentiles (A.C. Pegis, Trans.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Aquinas, T., 1981. Summa theologica. Westminster, MD: Christian Classics.
Augustine, 2003. City of God, Penguin classics. London; New York: Penguin Books.
Barrett, J.L., 2004. Why Would Anyone Believe in God?, Cognitive science of religion series. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
Barrett, J.L., 2011. Cognitive Science, Religion, and Theology from Human Minds to Divine Minds. West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Press.
Barrett, J.L., 2000. Exploring the natural foundations of religion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences [Online], 4(1), pp.29–34. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01419-9 [visited on 27 August 2021].
Barrett, J.L. and Church, I.M., 2013. Should CSR give atheists epistemic assurance? On beer-goggles, BFFs, and skepticism regarding religious beliefs. The Monist [Online], 96(3), pp.311–324. Available at: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/42751255> [visited on 27 August 2021].
Basinger, D., 2018. Miracles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boyer, P., 2001. Religion Explained the Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought [Online]. New York: Basic Books. Available at: <http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.30744> [visited on 27 August 2021].
Brożek, B., 2013. Philosophy and Neuroscience: Three Modes of Interaction. In: J. Stelmach, B. Brożek and Ł. Kurek, eds. Philosophy in Neuroscience [Online]. Kraków: Copernicus Center Press, pp.15–57. Available at: <https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2378013> [visited on 27 August 2021].
Casler, K. and Kelemen, D., 2008. Developmental Continuity in Teleo-Functional Explanation: Reasoning about Nature Among Romanian Romani Adults. Journal of Cognition and Development [Online], 9(3), pp.340–362. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/15248370802248556.
Clayton, P. and Peacocke, A.R., eds., 2004. In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being: Panentheistic Reflections on God’s Presence in a Scientific World. Grand Rapids, MI; Cambridge, UK: William B. Eerdmann Publishing Company.
De Cruz, H. and De Smedt, J., 2012. Evolved cognitive biases and the epistemic status of scientific beliefs. Philosophical Studies [Online], 157(3), pp.411–429. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-010-9661-6 [visited on 27 August 2021].
De Cruz, H. and De Smedt, J., 2015. A Natural History of Natural Theology: The Cognitive Science of Theology and Philosophy of Religion. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press.
Einstein, A., 1931. The World As I See It. Forum and Century, 84, pp.193–194.
Gilson, É., 1991. The Spirit of Mediaeval Philosophy. Notre Dame, IN; London: University of Notre Dame Press.
Greshake, G., 1997. Der dreieine Gott: eine trinitarische Theologie. Freiburg; Basel; Wien: Herder.
Grygiel, W., 2011. Metodologiczne aspekty uprawiania filozofii umysłu w kontekście nauk kognitywnych. In: B. Brożek, J. Mączka, W.P. Grygiel and M.L. Hohol, eds. Oblicza racjonalności: wokół myśli Michała Hellera. Kraków: Copernicus Center Press; Konsorcjum Akademickie Wydawnictwo, pp.51–62.
Grygiel, W., 2017. Science and human religiosity from the perspective of the cognitive science of religion. Analecta Cracoviensia [Online], 49, pp.177–194. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15633/acr.2412 [visited on 27 August 2021].
Grygiel, W., 2020. The doctrine of the intelligent design from the point of view of the cognitive science of religion. Scientia et Fides [Online], 8(1), pp.165–181. Available at: https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2020.006Rece [visited on 27 August 2021].
Guthrie, S.E., 1993. Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hawking, S.W. and Mlodinov, L., 2010. The Grand Design: New Answers to the Ultimate Questions of Life. London et al.: Bantam Books.
Heller, M., 2002. Sens życia i sens Wszechświata: studia z teologii współczesnej, Teologia na Trzecie Tysiąclecie. Tarnów: Biblos.
Heller, M., 2003a. Chaos, Probability and the Compressibility of the World. Creative Tension: Essays on Science and Religion. Philadelphia; London: Templeton Foundation Press, pp.127–143.
Heller, M., 2003b. Scientific Rationality and Christian Logos. Creative Tension: Essays on Science and Religion. Philadelphia ; London: Templeton Foundation Press, pp.47–57.
Heller, M., 2006. Teorie wszystkiego. Filozofia i wszechświat: wybór pism. Kraków: TAiWPN Universitas, pp.237–255.
Heller, M., 2016. Teologia dzisiaj – detronizowanie królowej? Lectio magistralis. In: M. Wiertek, ed. Promotio doctoris honoris causa Pontificiae Universitatis Cracoviensis Ioannis Pauli II Reverendissimus professor Michael Heller. Kraków: Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie, pp.53–62.
Hume, D., 2008. An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, Oxford World’s Classics. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
John Paul II, 1983. The Apostolic Constitution ’Divinus Perfectionis Magister’ [Online]. Available at: <https://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/apost_constitutions/documents/hf_jp-ii_apc_25011983_divinus-perfectionis-magister.html> [visited on 27 August 2021].
McGrew, T., 2019. Miracles. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [Online]. Spring 2019. Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Available at: <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/miracles/> [visited on 27 August 2021].
Murphy, N.C., 1995. Divine action in the natural order: Buridan’s ass and Schrödinger’s cat. In: R.J. Russell, N.C. Murphy and A.R. Peacocke, eds. Chaos and Complexity: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action. 1st, Series on “Scientific perspectives on divine action”. Vatican City State; Berkeley, CA: Vatican Observatory Publications; Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, pp.325–358.
Murray, M.J. and Goldberg, A., 2010. Evolutionary Accounts of Religion: Explaining and Explaining Away. In: J. Schloss and M.J. Murray, eds. The Believing Primate: Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Reflections on the Origin of Religion [Online]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.179–199. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557028.001.0001 [visited on 27 August 2021].
Peacocke, A.R., 1995. God’s Intervention in the World. In: R.J. Russell, N.C. Murphy and A.R. Peacocke, eds. Chaos and Complexity: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action. 1st, Series on "Scientific perspectives on divine action". Vatican City State; Berkeley, CA: Vatican Observatory Publications; Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, pp.263–288.
Peacocke, A.R., 2004. Articulating God’s presence in and to the world unveiled by the sciences. In: P. Clayton and A.R. Peacocke, eds. In whom we live and move and have our being: panentheistic reflections on God’s presence in a scientific world. Grand Rapids, MI; Cambridge, UK: William B. Eerdmann Publishing Company, pp.137–154.
Pedersen, O., 2007. The Two Books: Historical Notes on Some Interactions Between Natural Science and Theology (T. Sierotowicz and G.V. Coyne, Trans.). Vatican City: Vatican Observatory Foundation.
Plantinga, A., 2001. Methodological Naturalism. In: R.T. Pennock, ed. Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics: Philosophical, Theological, and Scientific Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp.339–361.
Plantinga, A., 2008. What is “Intervention”? Theology and Science [Online], 6(4), pp.369–401. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700802396106 [visited on 29 August 2021].
Polkinghorne, J.C., 1998. Science and Theology: An Introduction. London; Minneapolis, MN: SPCK (Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge); Fortress Press.
Pyysiäinen, I., 2001. Cognition, emotion, and religious experience. In: J. Andresen, ed. Religion in Mind: Cognitive Perspectives on Religious Belief, Ritual, and Experience. Cambridge, UK; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp.70–93.
Quine, W.V.O., 1951. Two dogmas of empiricism. Philosophical Review [Online], 60(1), pp.20–43. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2266637.
Rusecki, M., 2006. Traktat o cudzie. Lublin: Komitet Nauk Teologicznych PAN; Wydawnictwo KUL.
Russell, R.J., 2001. Divine action and quantum mechanics: A fresh assessment. In: R.J. Russell, P. Clayton, K. Wegter-McNelly and J.C. Polkinghorne, eds. Quantum Mechanics: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, A Series on “Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action” 5. Vatican City State; Berkeley: Vatican Obserwatory; Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, pp.293–328.
Słomka, M., 2021. God’s Action in the World: A New Philosophical Analysis. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Świeżyński, A., 2012. Filozofia cudu: w poszukiwaniu adekwatnej koncepcji zdarzenia cudownego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego.
Van Eyghen, H., 2019. Is supernatural belief unreliably formed? International Journal for Philosophy of Religion [Online], 85(2), pp.125–148. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-018-9671-4 [visited on 29 August 2021].
Van Eyghen, H., 2020. Religious belief as acquired second nature. Zygon [Online], 55(1), pp.185–206. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12575.
Wildman, W., 2004. The Divine Action Project, 1988–2003. Theology and Science [Online], 2(1), pp.31–75. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1474670042000196612 [visited on 30 August 2021].
Wszołek, S., 2004. Wprowadzenie do filozofii religii, Myśl Filozoficzna. Kraków: Wydawnictwo WAM.