Main Article Content
Evolutionary psychology offers a fairly ‘patriarchal’ picture of sex differences, according to which men are, ‘by nature’, (a) much more polygamously disposed, (b) much more desirous of power over the opposite sex (this desire manifests itself in their more intense sexual jealousy), and (c) much more aggressive than women. However, the picture – at least in its components (a) and (b) – becomes problematic if one looks at the history of conceptions of paternity accepted by our ancestors. It is argued in the paper that the very fact that our ancestors accepted various and essentially different conceptions of paternity casts a shadow of doubt on the ‘patriarchal’ picture of sex differences (especially if this fact is coupled with the hypothesis that our most distant – Pleistocene – ancestors accepted the conceptions which deny or marginalize the role of father in the process of the generation of children).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Bachofen, J.J., 1967. Myth, Religion, and Mother Right: Selected Writings [Mutterrecht und Urreligion] (R. Manheim, Trans.), Bollingen Series 84. New York; Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Buss, D.M., 1998. The psychology of human mate selection: Exploring the complexity of the strategic repertoire. In: C. Crawford and D. Krebs, eds. Handbook of evolutionary psychology: ideas, issues, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, pp.405–429.
Buss, D.M. and Schmitt, D.P., 2011. Evolutionary Psychology and Feminism. Sex Roles [Online], 64(9), pp.768–787. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9987-3 [visited on 17 December 2021].
Delaney, C., 1986. The meaning of paternity and the virgin birth debate. Man [Online], 21(3), pp.494–513. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2803098 [visited on 17 December 2021].
Engels, F., 2004. The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State (A. West, Trans.). Australia.
Hrdy, S.B., 1986. Empathy, Polyandry, and the Myth of the Coy Female. In: R. Bleier, ed. Feminist Approaches to Science, The Athene series. Kronberg-Taunus Pergamon Press, pp.119–146.
Hrdy, S.B., 1999. The Woman That Never Evolved: With a New Preface and Bibliographical Updates. Rev. ed. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Hrdy, S.B., 2001. The Past, Present, and Future of the Human Family. Tanner Lectures on Human Values, pp.57–110.
Hrdy, S.B., 2009. Mothers and Others: The Evolutionary Origins of Mutual Understanding. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Hubin, D., 2003. Daddy Dilemmas: Untangling the Puzzles of Paternity. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy [Online], 13(1), pp.29–80. Available at: <https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cjlpp/vol13/iss1/2>.
Kozłowski, J., 2018. Ewolucja człowieka jako seria dodatnich sprzężeń zwrotnych [Human evolution as a series of positive feedbacks]. Philosophical Problems in Science (Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce) [Online], (65), pp.145–176. Available at: <https://zfn.edu.pl/index.php/zfn/article/view/441> [visited on 17 December 2021].
Malinowski, B., 1913. The Family Among the Australian Aborigines: A Sociological Study. London: University of London Press.
Malinowski, B., 1927a. Sex and Repression in Savage Society. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co.
Malinowski, B., 1927b. The Father in Primitive Psychology. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.
Morgan, L.H., 1870. Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity of the Human Family [Online]. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.29577.
Pulman, B., 2004. Malinowski and Ignorance of Physiological Paternity. Revue Francaise de Sociologie [Online], 45(5), pp.121–142. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3917/rfs.455.0121 [visited on 17 December 2021].
Ridley, M., 1994. The Red Queen: Sex and the Evolution of Human Nature. Harmondsworth [Regne Unit]: Penguin Books.
Russell, B., 1929. Marriage and Morals. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Schmitt, D.P., 2015. Fundamentals of Human Mating Strategies. In: D.M. Buss, ed. The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology [Online]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp.258–291. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470939376.ch9 [visited on 17 December 2021].
Shackelford, T.K., Pound, N., Goetz, A.T. and Lamunyon, C.W., 2015. Female Infidelity and Sperm Competition. In: D.M. Buss, ed. The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology [Online]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp.372–393. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470939376.ch12 [visited on 17 December 2021].
Smuts, B., 1995. The evolutionary origins of patriarchy. Human Nature: An Interdisciplinary Biosocial Perspective [Online], 6(1), pp.1–32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02734133.
Trivers, R.L., 1972. Parental Investment and Sexual Selection. In: B. Campbell, ed. Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, Foundations of animal behavior: Classic papers with commentaries. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp.52–95.
Wilson, M. and Daly, M., 1992. The man who mistook his wife for a chattel. In: J. Barkow, L. Cosmides and J. Tooby, eds. The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp.289–322.