Where are Sunspots? The Practical Method of Galileo as an example of Mental Model

Main Article Content

Tadeusz Sierotowicz

Abstract

After the publication of Sidereus Nuncius, in the controversy with Ch. Scheiner, Galileo developed several arguments on behalf of the hypothesis that sunspots are contiguous to the surface of the Sun, and presented them in his Istoria e dimostrazioni intorno alle macchie solari e loro accidenti (Rome 1613). One of them, named by Galileo a Practical Method, advocates very clearly the correctness of the hypothesis. In the paper the method in question is briefly described. It is argued that the Practical Method is not a thought experiment, but rather a mental model proposed precisely in order to solve the problem of sunspots’ location.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Camerota, M., 2004. Galileo Galilei e la cultura scientifica nell’etŕ della Controriforma [Galileo Galilei and scientific culture in the Counter-Reformation age]. Roma: Salerno Editore.

Camilleri, K., 2015. Knowing what would happen: The epistemic strategies in Galileo’s thought experiments. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 54, pp.102–112. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.08.009.

Craik, K.J.W., 1943. The Nature of Explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fantoli, A., 2003. Galileo: For Copernicanism and for the Church. 3rd. Cittŕ del Vaticana: Vatican Observatory Publications.

Favaro, A., ed., 1890–1909. Le opere di Galileo Galilei: Edizione Nazionale. Firenze: Tipografia di G. Barbčra.

Galilei, G., 1613. Istoria e dimostrazioni in torno alle macchie solari e loro accidenti. Roma: Appresso Giacomo Mascardi.

Galilei, G., 2010. On sunspots. In: Reeves, E.A. and Van Helden, A. eds. On Sunspots. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp.59–304.

Galilei, G. and Scheiner, C., 2010. On Sunspots. Ed. by E.A. Reeves and A. Van Helden. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Heilbron, J.L., 2010. Galileo. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nersessian, N.J., 1992. In the Theoretician’s Laboratory: Thought Experimenting as Mental Modeling. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1992(2), pp.291–301. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1992.2.192843.

Nersessian, N.J., 2008. Creating Scientific Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Palmerino, C.R., 2018. Discussing what would happen: the role of thought experiments in Galileo’s dialogues. Philosophy of Science, 85(5), pp.906–918. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/699717.

Palmieri, P., 2003. Mental models in Galileo’s early mathematization of nature. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 34(2), pp.229–264. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(03)00025-6.

Shea, W.R., 1970. Galileo, Scheiner, and the Interpretation of Sunspots. Isis, 61(4), pp.498–519. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/350682.

Sierotowicz, T.M., 2013. O położeniu plam słonecznych: literatura, dialektyka, retoryka, filozofia i astronomia w "Istoria e dimostrazioni intorno alle macchie solari" Galileusza wraz z tłumaczeniem dzieła [On the Site of The Sunspots: Literature, Dialectics, Rhetoric, Philosophy and Astronomy in “Istoria e Dimostrazioni Intorno Alle Macchie Solari” of Galilei]. Tarnów: Wydawnictwo Diecezji Tarnowskiej Biblos.

Stuart, M.T., Fehige, Y. and Brown, J.R., eds., 2018. The Routledge companion to thought experiments, Routledge philosophy companions. London, New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Succi, S. and Coveney, P.V., 2019. Big data: the end of the scientific method? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences [Online], 377(2142), p.20180145. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0145 [Accessed 3 June 2019].