What is a 'miracle argument'? An attempt of defense of scientific realism based on the fact of the scientific success

Jacek Rodzeń


The so-called 'miracle argument', or the argument from the success of science, is probably one of the best-known arguments in favor of scientific realism. We first present a short history of philosophical anticipations of the main idea, which can be found in the works of C. Clavius, W. Whewell and P. Duhem. Then we consider three 'classical' versions of the 'miracle argument' proposed by J.J.C. Smart, H. Putnam and R.N. Boyd. The views of three other authors (B. van Fraassen, L. Laudan and A. Fine), critical with respect to the argument, are also briefly presented. We suggest a possible development of the 'miracle argument' by taking into account other aspects of the success in science, such as: success in the road to unification, effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences, success of laboratory technologies.


miracle argument; scientific realism; success in science

Full Text:

PDF (Język Polski)


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Until the completion of the migration of the journal to the OJS platform, some of the archival issues could be available only at our former website.

http://zfn.edu.pl/public/site/images/pawel_polak/CC_BY_NC_ND.pngThe articles in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Polska (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 PL).

1978- Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce,
e-mail: zagadnienia@upjp2.edu.pl

ISSN 0867-8286
e-ISSN 2451-0602